I say it again: to hell with the media. I'll let Jeff Goldstein explain:
Freedom of the press only works when the press is truly representative of divergent opinions. But like many disciplines in the academy, the mainstream press has become nothing more than another “progressive” advocacy group — desirous of teaching the rubes whatever “lessons” are deemed necessary to get voters to think “correctly.” From there, it is but a small step toward convincing oneself that, as a “reporter,” the methods by which you achieve that end are subordinate to the end itself — and so certain literary license or a particular “framing” is perfectly acceptable, given that what is important is how people interpret. Give them what they need to make the “right” reading and you’ve done the nation a service.
Our press, conceived of in such a way and protected by the First Amendment and a mythology of its commitment to “objectivity,” is nowadays an embarrassment, frankly. And while the Palin feeding frenzy (based entirely on lies and sensationalism), when juxtaposed against the desire on the part of the press to bury unflattering stories about, say, John Edwards or Barack Obama (no matter how true they happen to be, or in Obama’s case, by refusing to do anything but the most cursory of “investigations” — be it into the Rezko connection, the Ayers / CAC connection and administration, etc.) clearly points to an almost in-your-face bias on the party of the mainstream press, unfortunately, the only people who know so are those that follow the news closely and skeptically.
if you think expanding a program by $3.9 million instead of $5 million counts as cutting funds, you’re qualified to work for one of America’s most esteemed newspapers.
Assholes. They'd be worthy of respect if they were only open about their ideology. As it stands, the media is worthy only of contempt.
Ace has a very good list of things that the MSM has "decided" for us about the Obama!/Jeremiah Wright mess:
Obama's 20 year political partnership with Wright may raise questions about his judgment, but it is wrongful for his political opponents to raise such questions in campaign ads. Some questions, it seems, are properly raised, but silently, in deep personal meditation, perhaps on an alpine hill while reading Rilke. Certainly we do not need to audibly ask questions about a presidential candidate. That's just hurtful and corrosive of our political process, which relies, at its core, of utter trust in our political leaders without question.
The whole Wright thing - or more specifically, the way that Obama has responded to the whole Wright thing - disgusts me. Barack Obama is lying when he says he didn't know about Jeremiah Wright's extreme views. You don't sit under the pastorate of a man for 20 years without getting to know that person's beliefs pretty well. And Wright is no shrinking violet, obviously. In the end, all of this puts the lie to the stupid spin that Obama is a "post-racial" candidate. Just the opposite - he's the racial candidate.
As for Wright, his teachings are a disgusting perversion of Christianity. Christianity is not a political religion. Christianity should, however, influence politics. But not the other way around, which is what Wright and his fellow Black Liberation Theologians do by viewing their "Christianity" through a purely political lens.
I've been studying Matthew at bible study this year, and it seems to me that the Black Liberation Theologians make the same error that the Jews of Jesus' time did, in that they both want Jesus to be a political revolutionary. To be sure, Jesus' teachings have consequences for how his followers should view the political realm, and over time they did lead to revolutionary changes in how nations were governed. But Jesus isn't a political figure. He transcends politics. To reduce him to the level of a political revolutionary denies him the honor that he truly deserves, and ultimately denies us the true meaning of his life and teachings - which leaves us in peril of missing out on the gift of salvation that he offers. My hope is that Wright will realize the error of his ways before it's too late.
Detroit City Council members reacted with indignation and a flurry of disbelieving questioning Tuesday after one of Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick's attorneys insisted that the mayor's text messages didn't trigger the settlement of a police whistle-blower lawsuit.
Wilson Copeland II, testifying on the first of three days of hearings the council is conducting, said the abrupt settlement of the lawsuit from two former cops was done to quickly wrap up a similar suit against the city from a third officer. He said it was not out of fear of the text messages, which showed Kilpatrick and former chief of staff Christine Beatty lied under oath at the whistle-blower trial.
After 20 years Obama was just about to get up and walk out of the door in protest of Wright’s demagoguery but don’t you know it, the old man goes and retires.
